Skip to main content

People of Color in the Bible

Galatians 3:28 teaches, "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus." God has always honored this principle. Man, however, has not.

Portraying Jesus as being one color or another is not a problem in and of itself. No brother or sister in Christ should ever object to visual portrayals of the Lord Jesus as being of any race. The problem is that the early fathers felt the bible was too Hebrew [black] so they devised a psychological operation that has resulted in many in the church to use the European Jesus image to exclude other peoples from identifying with Jesus as being one of them. Thus making the white Jesus a symbol of white supremacy in the role of divinity.

The first people of color in the Bible that we'll share about are the Egyptians. About 1/3 were black-skinned; more importantly, the people who lived in the area known as the Fayoum depression, which laid the foundation for Egyptian civilization in the dynastic ages, were black-skinned Africans.

Ethiopians, a race of black people, are another obvious people of color mentioned in scripture. The African continent was originally called Ethiopia. the Bible term "Ethiopia" refers to several black-skinned peoples who lived in the southern Nile area including modern-day Sudan. Moses had an Ethiopian wife. He married her after his first wife died. God loved her to the degree that He struck Marriam with leprosy for speaking against her. All Cushites descended from Ham, the youngest son of Noah and the ancestral father of Africans (see Gen. 9:19, 10:1-20).

Mark, who wrote the Gospel of Mark, was also a man of Cyrene, a north African Jew like Simon of Cyrene. He is the apostle who made the blessed confession "Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God" (Matthew 16:16). His gospel, the Gospel of Mark, is believed by Bible scholars to have been the first gospel written (it was written about 50 A.D.).

Another group of blacks mentioned in the Bible is the people of Cyrene. The people of Cyrene were African people who lived in what is now Libya. That is the African country where Simon of Cyrene came from, that blessed brother who helped the Lord Jesus bear His cross up to Mount Calvary (Matthew 27:32).

The icing on the cake is the evidence about Jesus. The first-century Jewish writer Josephus (37-100 AD) penned the earliest non-biblical testimony of Jesus. In his work Halosis or the “Capture of Jerusalem),” written around 72 A.D., Josephus discussed “the human form of Jesus and his wonderful works.” Biblical scholar Robert Eisler in a classic 1931 study of Josephus’ Testimony was able to reconstruct the unaltered testimony based on a newly-discovered Old Russian translation that preserved the original Greek text. According to Eisler’s reconstruction, the oldest non-Biblical description of Jesus read as follows:

“At that time also there appeared a certain man of magic power … if it is meet to call him a man, [whose name is Jesus], whom [certain] Greeks call a son of [a] God, but his disciples [call] the true prophet … he was a man of simple appearance, mature age, black-skinned, short growth, three cubits tall, hunchbacked, prognathous (lit. ‘with a long face’ [macroprosopos]), a long nose, eyebrows meeting above the nose … with scanty [curly] hair, but having a line in the middle of the head after the fashion of the Nazaraeans, with an undeveloped beard.”

This short, black-skinned, mature, hunchbacked Jesus with a unibrow, short curly hair, and undeveloped beard bear no resemblance to the Jesus Christ taken for granted today by most of the Christian world. In fact according to Ephesians 2:17 this genuine Jesus was near the Jews [blacks] than the Gentiles [Greeks].  Nevertheless there were many people of color that God used in the Bible. There are many people of color that God is using today. This is a very important area where our Bible teachers, our Bible schools, and our Bible seminaries are being imbalanced and therefore not telling the whole truth.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Contemporary Game

Game is, at its most basic level, a set of behavioral changes to life skills based on psychological and sociological concepts to enhance intersexual relationships between men and women. The supremacy of the Feminine Imperative is threatened by true emancipation from it. Consequently, Men with the vision to see past this are labeled Dark, Sociopathic and Deviant by the imperative. The imperative had to classify Game for itself - Evil vs. Good Game. Of course, the good is defined by whatever benefits the imperative, while the evil is defined by whatever benefits the masculine ‘selfishly.' Ref: The Rational Male
Post a Comment
Read more

Tale of Two Wolves

This idea that you have so much goodness in you that you can speak your desires into the universe, and god will appear from a jinni lamp and grant you your wishes because you are such a noble person created to be a winner and champion is a Sheol-bred lie. That is because inside man exists two wolves at war with one another. There's a good one and a bad one. The one who wins this battle is the one you feed.  In the light of the abovementioned native American folktale, St. Paul examined his inner experience and saw another law in his cravings and desires, warring against the principle of his mind, and bringing him into captivity to the rule of the flesh that is in his appetites and wants.  In conclusion to this observation, he exclaimed, "wretched and miserable man that I am! Who will [rescue me and] set me free from this body of death [this corrupt, mortal existence]?."  That exclamation encapsulates humanity's occulted struggle to understand what they do, despite expr...
Post a Comment
Read more

Unified Field Theory Psychiatry

Whether one examines the microcosm of the individual white personality or the macrocosm of the global white collective, the law of white genetic survival stands. That law can be stated in the following equation: white power over non-white powerlessness, or w÷nw. Nonetheless, the implication of the law for whites is a failure of individual and collective white self-respect, based upon the negative image and concept of the self.  In the white collective, there is self-esteem, which is a compensatory inflated sense of the self, but there is not fundamental respect for the genetic white self. The implications for psychiatry are as follows: based on a negative image and concept of self, brain-computer evolves pattern of neurochemistry, logic, thought, speech, action, emotional response, and perception that are self- and group-negating and productive of disharmony in the universe. These are patterns of neurochemistry and behavior consistent with various degrees of mental illness.  B...
Post a Comment
Read more