Skip to main content

How To Test Your Emotional Maturity

One of the more puzzling aspects of the way we're built is that our emotional development does not necessarily or automatically keep pace with our physical growth. We can be 55 on the outside and four and a half in terms of our impulses and manner of communicating just as we can be on the threshold of adulthood physically, while an emotional sage within. To assess our own and others emotional development, we can make use of the deceptive question illustrated below which can quickly get to the core of our underlying emotional age. 

There are three methods which indicate emotionally immature behaviour. We might grade ourselves on a scale of one to 10 according to our propensities. 




Firstly, we might sulk. 
That is, we simultaneously get very upset while refusing to explain to the person who has upset us what the problem might actually, be. The insult to our pride and dignity feels too great. We are too internally fragile to reveal that we've been knocked we hope against hope that another person might simply magically understand what they've done and fix it without us needing to speak. Rather as an infant who hasn't yet mastered language might have a hope that a parent would spontaneously enter their minds and just guess what was ailing them. 


Secondly, we might get furious
Another response is to get extremely and disproportionately angry with the disappointing person our fury may look powerful but no one who felt powerful would have any need for such Titanic rage inside. We feel broken at sea and bereft but our only way of reasserting control is to mimic an aggrieved emperor or taunted Tiger. Our insults and viciousness are in their coded ways admissions of terror and defenselessness. Our pain is profoundly poignant our manner of dealing with it a good deal sadder. 


Thirdly we might go cold.
It takes a lot of courage to admit to someone who hurt us that we care that they have power over us that a key bit of our life is in their hands. It may be a lot easier to put up a strenuous wall of indifference at precisely the moment when we are most emotionally vulnerable to a loved one's behaviour. We insist that we haven't noticed a slight and wouldn't give a damn anyway. We may not simply be pretending. Remaining in touch with our wounds may have become conclusively intolerable. Not feeling anything may have replaced the enormous threat of being fully alive. These three responses pointers in turn to the three markers of emotional maturity. 





Firstly the capacity to explain.
That is the power simple to describe but with a bit proper accomplishment in practice to explain why we are upset to the person who's upset us. To have faith that we can find the words that we are not pathetic or wretched for suffering in a given way and that with a bit of luck, we will find the words to make ourselves understood by someone whom we can remember deep down even at this moment of stress is not our enemy.



Secondly the capacity to stay calm. 
The mature person knows that a robust self-assertion is always an option down the line. This gives them the confidence not to need to shout immediately to give others the benefit of every doubt and not to assume the worst and then hit back with undue force. The mature like themselves enough not to suspect that everyone would have a good reason to mock and slander them.


Thirdly the capacity to be vulnerable. 
The mature know and have made their peace with the idea that being close to anyone will open them up to being hurt. They feel enough inward strength to possess a tolerable relationship with their own weakness. They are unembarrassed enough by their emotional nakedness to tell even the person who has apparently humiliated them that they require help. They trust ultimately that there is nothing wrong with their tears and that they have the right to find someone who will know how to bear them. 


In turn, these three traits belong to what we can call the three cardinal virtues of emotional maturity: Communication, Trust & Vulnerability. These three virtues were either gifted to us during a warm and nourishing childhood or else we will need to learn them arguably as adults. This is akin to the difference between growing up speaking a foreign language and having to learn it over many months. As an adult however the comparison at least gives us an impression of the scale of the challenge ahead of us. There is nothing to be ashamed of concerning our possible present ignorance. At least half of us weren't brought up in the land of emotional literacy. We may just never have heard adults around us speaking an emotionally mature dialect so we may; despite our age, need to go right back to school and spend five to ten thousand hours learning with great patience and faith, the beautiful and complex grammar of the language of Emotional Adulthood. 

© The School of Life

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Contemporary Game

Game is, at its most basic level, a set of behavioral changes to life skills based on psychological and sociological concepts to enhance intersexual relationships between men and women. The supremacy of the Feminine Imperative is threatened by true emancipation from it. Consequently, Men with the vision to see past this are labeled Dark, Sociopathic and Deviant by the imperative. The imperative had to classify Game for itself - Evil vs. Good Game. Of course, the good is defined by whatever benefits the imperative, while the evil is defined by whatever benefits the masculine ‘selfishly.' Ref: The Rational Male

Tale of Two Wolves

This idea that you have so much goodness in you that you can speak your desires into the universe, and god will appear from a jinni lamp and grant you your wishes because you are such a noble person created to be a winner and champion is a Sheol-bred lie. That is because inside man exists two wolves at war with one another. There's a good one and a bad one. The one who wins this battle is the one you feed.  In the light of the abovementioned native American folktale, St. Paul examined his inner experience and saw another law in his cravings and desires, warring against the principle of his mind, and bringing him into captivity to the rule of the flesh that is in his appetites and wants.  In conclusion to this observation, he exclaimed, "wretched and miserable man that I am! Who will [rescue me and] set me free from this body of death [this corrupt, mortal existence]?."  That exclamation encapsulates humanity's occulted struggle to understand what they do, despite expr...

Unified Field Theory Psychiatry

Whether one examines the microcosm of the individual white personality or the macrocosm of the global white collective, the law of white genetic survival stands. That law can be stated in the following equation: white power over non-white powerlessness, or w÷nw. Nonetheless, the implication of the law for whites is a failure of individual and collective white self-respect, based upon the negative image and concept of the self.  In the white collective, there is self-esteem, which is a compensatory inflated sense of the self, but there is not fundamental respect for the genetic white self. The implications for psychiatry are as follows: based on a negative image and concept of self, brain-computer evolves pattern of neurochemistry, logic, thought, speech, action, emotional response, and perception that are self- and group-negating and productive of disharmony in the universe. These are patterns of neurochemistry and behavior consistent with various degrees of mental illness.  B...