Chocolate with Nuts: Valentine’s Symbol of Black Male Semen in the White Woman's Vagina

Other important holidays in the white supremacy culture further reveal the intricate workings of this symbolism. On both St. Valentine's Day and Mother's Day, the white male gives gifts of chocolate candy with nuts. In the first instance, he gives it to his sweetheart, and in the second to his mother. If his sweetheart ingests "chocolate with nuts," the white male can fantasize that he is genetically equal to the Black male. And if his mother had ingested "chocolate with nuts," he would not have to worry about white genetic annihilation—as he would have been "colored" and then could be an annihilator of white genes like the feared and envied Black male.

Both the valentine shape and the chocolate candy have a symbolic meaning not previously recognized, examined nor understood by Western culture investigators. However, once the unified field of the Western culture dynamic (behavior dynamic) is set forth, it will be seen that these fragments of symbolism take on a brilliant clarity.

The relationship of the valentine to an ancient fertility rite suggests that the so-called "heart" shape of the valentine may be less associated with the anatomical heart of the human body, as is commonly thought, than with the symbolic drawing of the female genital organ, the vaginal opening. As explained in Ajit Mookerjee's and Madhu Khanna's The Tantric Way, in Tantric worship in India, this organ is frequently drawn in the form of a heart or an upside-down triangle, with the base upward. It is clear that the organ of the heart in the human body has much less an association with fertility than the vagina or the vaginal orifice.

Cirlot states, "The importance of love in the mystic doctrine of unity explains how it is that love-symbolism came to be closely linked with heart-symbolism, for to love is only to experience a force which urges the lover towards a given centre." Indeed, in Tantric philosophy and art, the symbol of unity was the union of the male and female genital organs, and this unity was reverently portrayed in sculpture and graphic arts.

This pattern of logic and thought surrounding chocolate (dark brown) candy and other desserts most certainly cannot be held in isolation from the previously mentioned preoccupations over suntanning and the white female preference for males who are tall and dark, or the preoccupation in sports of placing large brown balls (testicle symbols) in white net (vaginal) orifices and between goal posts (white upright legs). A unified field theory in the behavioral sciences demands that gross and subtle interconnections between behavioral phenomena be perceived before they can be understood.

That there should be myriad behaviors in the white supremacy behavior system that reflect a deep desire to counteract and compensate for the perceived genetic deficiency of white skin should not be at all surprising. Thus, the customary and traditional little packets of chocolate candy (often with nuts), placed inside of the heart or vaginal orifice-shaped box, are like little sperm packages of Black genetic material being placed in the vaginal orifice. When presented by the white male to the white female, in the context of the skin color-deficient culture, the act is the exact parallel to the white male coaches who coach their Black basketball and football players to place dark brown balls in white net orifices or in white upright legs.

One must conclude that the white male realizes consciously or unconsciously that the most desired mate for the white female is the Black male, just as he realizes that his most desired sexual mate is the Black female. This illuminates the white male's fascination with black stockings, black underwear, and black negroes as sexual symbols.

The conscious and/or unconscious acceptance and internalization of a symbol system based upon the castrated Black male genitalia is essential to the global system of white genetic survival.

However, the process of liberation is one wherein the oppressed begin to clearly distinguish their perceptions, logic, and thought processes from the oppressors'. The oppressed then begin to respect and validate their perceptions, logic, and thought processes, realizing fully that they can never free themselves with the thought processes and perceptions that were part of the process of their enslavement. Black psychiatrists have the responsibility of clarifying all aspects of the oppressive dynamic of white genetic survival for Black people. This includes exposing and decoding the major symbolism of that power system.

Reference

Frances Cress Welsing's The Isis Papers: The Keys to the Colors (1991) explores the dynamics of race and the symbolism of white supremacy

A Timeless Guide: The Origin of the Word 'Mentor'

The word "mentor" has become a ubiquitous term in modern society, used to describe a wise and trusted advisor who offers guidance, wisdom, and support to a less experienced individual. However, the origins of this word can be traced back to the ancient world, where the concept of mentorship played a significant role in shaping the lives of individuals and the transmission of knowledge.

Click image to enlarge

The earliest known use of the term "mentor" can be found in Homer's epic poem, the Odyssey, written in the 8th century BC. In the story, Odysseus, the king of Ithaca, entrusts his son, Telemachus, to the care of a wise and trusted friend named Mentor, who acts as a guide and advisor during Odysseus' long absence. This ancient tale not only introduces the concept of mentorship but also highlights the important role that mentors play in the development and guidance of younger individuals.

The author of "A Reflection on the Art and Practice of Mentorship" delves deeper into the multifaceted nature of Mentor's role in the Odyssey, identifying three key functions: that of a Regent, an Elder Teacher, and a guide for an entire nation . Similarly, the "Brief History of Mentorship" chapter explores the enduring influence of the mentor-mentee relationship, tracing its evolution from the ancient Greek mythos to its modern-day applications, particularly in the field of professional development and education (Irby et al., 2020). 

Over time, the concept of mentorship has transcended its mythological roots to become a cornerstone of various fields. In the realm of professional development, mentorship serves as a critical component in nurturing talent and fostering career growth. The mentor-mentee relationship facilitates the transfer of not only technical knowledge but also organizational culture and soft skills, thereby enabling mentees to navigate complex professional landscapes with greater efficacy.

Moreover, the educational sector has embraced mentorship as a vital tool for enhancing learning experiences and outcomes. Educators often take on mentorship roles, guiding students through academic challenges and helping them to develop critical thinking skills and intellectual curiosity. This dynamic is reflective of the ancient mentor-mentee paradigm, wherein wisdom and knowledge are imparted through close, personal interaction and guidance.

The enduring legacy of the mentor figure from the Odyssey can be seen in contemporary mentorship practices, which continue to emphasize the importance of trust, wisdom, and support. Modern mentors, much like Mentor in the ancient epic, provide a stabilizing influence and a source of wisdom, helping mentees to achieve their full potential. This timeless concept underscores the fundamental human need for guidance and the transmission of knowledge across generations.

In conclusion, the word "mentor" carries with it a rich historical legacy that underscores its significance in both ancient and modern contexts. From its origins in Homer's Odyssey to its current applications in professional and educational settings, the concept of mentorship remains a vital and transformative force. The timeless nature of this practice highlights the universal value of guidance, wisdom, and support in fostering individual growth and the continuity of knowledge. 

References:

Ferreres, A. R. (2018). "A Brief History of Mentorship." In *Mentoring in Surgery*.

Hughes, T. (2003). "A Reflection on the Art and Practice of Mentorship."

Irby, D. M., Cooke, M., & O'Brien, B. C. (2020). Educating Physicians: A Call for Reform of Medical School and Residency. 

The Marriage Ultimatum: It's not Personal, Just Business

We've all seen it in movies or heard from friends: the dreaded "When are we getting married?" conversation. It's a question that can send shivers down anyone's spine, ushering in a wave of emotional pressure.

This scenario unfolds in a familiar pattern. A man enjoys a happy relationship, but as time marches on, the woman's desire for marriage grows stronger. Feeling a sense of urgency, she starts, often unintentionally, to pile on the pressure.

The pressure cooker environment can manifest in a few key ways. The woman might deploy tactics that trigger specific emotions – guilt, shame, or even fear – to nudge the man towards marriage. Emotional manipulation might rear its head through comments that subtly question his commitment or veiled threats about the relationship's future. If these tactics prove ineffective, she might withdraw emotionally, becoming distant or disagreeable. This shift in behavior creates a suffocating atmosphere, leaving the man feeling trapped and desperate to recapture the earlier, happier dynamic.

In my experience as a consultant, I've seen this scenario play out countless times. The butterflies-in-your-stomach phase can quickly sour when the "When are we getting married?" conversation arrives

And note to all you ladies out there, neither of these strategies is a particularly good idea with respect to your goals. In any case, these men are generally legitimately conflicted. They clearly care about the women in question and are nervous about the prospect of losing them. And they also have valid concerns about radically changing the structure of their relationships. Concerns that all too often fall deaf on their women's ears, which does little to reassure them. These men are struggling and they don't know what to do. So I've created an analogy to help them understand what they're going through. 

The analogy is this:

At some point in his life, practically every man has been in a situation where he's dealing with a woman he's not particularly attracted to and may not even like. But he's dealing with her because he's horny and he wants to have sex.

It is what it is.

Now, when guys are dealing with a woman like that, they tend to get more aggressive with respect to securing the sexual encounter. And the reason they do this is because there isn't anything else they want from her to this man. The woman in question isn't funny or charming, so he doesn't find her enjoyable to just have around. And she isn't wise or intelligent, so she isn't teaching him something that he's interested in learning, and she isn't useful or helpful, so she isn't furthering his goals.

She's not any of these things.

If she did provide other ways in which he could meaningfully benefit from the relationship, then he might be able to content himself without the sexual element. But in the absence of these ways, there's no reason for him to stick around and deal with that woman without sex.

He wants one thing because he's not getting anything else that he wants, and without that one thing, there is no basis for further interaction. And that's what motivates men in these circumstances to be more aggressive. It's like, hey, I'm cool either way, but if you're not going to move things forward, I can't really deal with you. I'm going to move on and that's a rational decision given that man's perception of the situation. 

I get you fellas, but here's the thing. What you do to a woman under those circumstances is analogous to what a woman does to you when she's pressuring you to marry her.

Let that sink in!

If there were other ways in which she felt she was benefiting from that arrangement, if she was content with your extrapolated lifestyle and the things you did together and the opportunities you create for her and the status she enjoys in relating to you and the good sex that you consistently have, and she could see no better options that could give her more of what she wants, then she wouldn't be as pushy for marriage.

This is because being pushy is a risk.

Sometimes when you rock the boat, you end up falling out. This isn't always a bad thing, of course, as it functionally forces the pushy person to move on to a different relationship where she might stand a better chance of getting what she wants. But a woman is generally pushy for marriage to the extent that she's not getting anything else that she wants from that relationship. And the real kicker here is that she might not be getting anything else from the relationship because you already gave it to her.

Remember, to want is to lack.

So if she already has it, she's not going to want it. So if marriage is the only thing you haven't given her yet, then what else is she going to want? And if she's not getting anything else to compensate her for not getting the thing that she wants, then she's going to get more pushy. It makes sense.

Now don't get me wrong. A woman can want whatever she wants, and if she's not getting what she wants, then barring some other commitment to the contrary, she has every right to leave that relationship and move on. But a woman who acts that way, men, doesn't love you more than she loves what she wants.

Love's highest good is simply to continue to exist in the presence of the loved one.

That's it. Everything else pales in comparison. A woman who threatens to leave you if you don't marry her is functionally telling you that she wants things more than she wants to continue to be with you. She doesn't love you. In this moment, she is looking to do business. So don't confuse the two. The upshot is, from the perspective of both men and women, the more someone is pushy, the less you should give them what they want.

Like, women don't have sex with guys who are pushy about having sex with you.

They're pushy to the extent that they don't want anything else from you. Because if they did want something else and they were getting it, they wouldn't be so aggressive.

By the same token, men don't marry women who are pushy about getting married.

They're pushy to the extent that they don't want anything else from you. Because if they did want something else and they were getting it, they wouldn't be so aggressive. Women treat men the way men treat jobs. When a woman is pushy for marriage, she's functionally saying,

look, I've been in this role for two years, five years, ten years, whatever, and I want a promotion to permanent job security. If you do not give me said promotion, I am going to go to a different company.

And it's like, fair enough, ladies, but men, what you have to understand is that a woman who engages you like this isn't coming from a place of love. She's coming from a place of motivated self interest. She's looking to do business, which is, after all, precisely what a relationship is for.

So that's not necessarily the problem.

What is potentially the problem is a woman who is assertively negotiating for something of great benefit to her without offering anything of great benefit in return. Doing this is bad business and will likely cause the woman to be rejected, especially if the man has any optionality to speak of. If she's going to do business, then you got to do business.

Ask yourself, what would I hope to get out of this?

What are the costs?

What are the risks?

Are they sufficiently offset by the potential benefits I hope to accrue from this situation? And both sides need to remember that at this point, it's not personal. It's just business. It's not personal if a woman decides to lateral to a different company with a more attractive compensation package. After all, it's much easier to remain loyal to one's perceived best interest. And it's not personal if a man decides that a certain employee is better suited for a role as an independent contributor than as a corporate officer. After all, people don't become the CEO simply due to seniority.

It also means that the people, men and women, who are most likely to get what they want are the ones who seem not to want these things. Like the guy who doesn't seem to care one way or the other if he has sex is way more likely to get laid than the guy who is pushing aggressive for intercourse.

Why?

Because his apparent indifference kind of makes the sexual encounter feel safer for a woman to proceed. By the same token, the woman who doesn't seem to care one way or the other if she gets married is more likely to get married than the woman who is pushy and aggressive for a ring.

Why?

Because her apparent indifference kind of makes matrimony feel safer for a man to proceed. It's the same fucking thing. The person who has more to lose needs to be reassured, needs to be made to feel safe in order to proceed with sex. The party who has more to lose is the woman. With marriage, the party who has more to lose is the man. To the extent that men want to marry women who love them, men will paradoxically be most motivated in marrying women who do not seem to care whether about whether or not they get married. Something to keep in mind ladies. What do you think, Does this fit with your experience? Let me know in the comments below.

Reference: Orion Taraban, Psy.D. PsycHacks

Women Do The Right Things With The Wrong Men

To illustrate what I mean by this, let me share an anecdote from my personal life. Many years ago, the woman I was dating had a girlfriend come into town, and the three of us went out to dinner together. And over the course of this meal, it became apparent that this woman didn't yet have a place to stay for the night. The woman I was seeing invited her to stay with her, but this woman's solution was to text a guy she had gone out with a few months ago. The plan was to meet him out for a drink, go back to his place, spend the night with him, and then get on with whatever it was that she came into town to do.

Now the guy doesn't know this yet. This is just the woman's plan for the evening. When we expressed our concern, she tried to reassure us by saying, oh, it's fine. I don't really like this guy, so it's okay if I just use him for the night. And I remember turning to the woman I was with and jokingly asking her if she might try liking me a little less, but like all good jokes, there was some truth to it.

Ladies, if you call me up, invite me out for a drink, come back to my place, have sex with me all night, leave in the morning, and don't communicate with me until you're ready to do that again. I guarantee I won't feel like you don't like me. What's more, I will feel very positively about you.

From the man's perspective, that woman's plan had an extremely high good times to hassle ratio.

The interaction was easy, effortless, fun, inexpensive convenient, and sexually satisfying. If you treat a man like this, I guarantee that he will want to see you again. This is because men do not encounter good times to hassle ratio women very often. Frankly, y'all can be a real handful So if you give a guy a lot of what he wants and not a lot of what he doesn't, he will text you back. He will answer your phone call. And in the vast majority of cases, he will attempt to replicate that encounter sooner as opposed to later, because you gave him an extremely positive experience, even if only once. He will often go to great lengths and expense to make it happen again. And isn't that what you want a guy to go to great lengths and expense for you?

Unfortunately, this woman kind of wasted this experience. Yeah, she got a place to stay for the night, so she saved a few hundred bucks, but she didn't really like the guy, remember? In fact, she even live in the same town, so it would be difficult for her to get much more out of the relationship, even if she did like him. Imagine if she had done this with a guy she actually did like, and who was in a position to offer her a relationship. She could have saved a few hundred thousand bucks while spending her nights with a man she actually felt positively about. That's the power of a Good times to hassle ratio.

But what do women do when they meet a guy they actually like? First and foremost, they often want to take it slow. Women seem to have this belief that having sex too soon somehow disqualifies them from a long term relationship. It does not. On the contrary, as we'll see, it's waiting too long that generally does. However, what taking it slow functionally does is make the courtship process significantly more expensive for the man like expensive in every possible way. It's expensive by way of time, attention, money, effort, opportunity, and often frustration. Men do not feel liked when you make them jump through hoops to get sex. Men do not feel liked when you give them less of what they want and more of what they don't. Men do not feel liked when interactions with you are difficult, effortful, serious, expensive, inconvenient, and sexually frustrating. Are you listening? And in the second case, when a woman meets a guy she actually likes, it tends to arouse her insecurities because she is now in an emotionally risky situation After all, if the guy she didn't really like doesn't like her back, she might not bat an eyelash. However, if the guy she does like doesn't like her back, she might be significantly distressed.

So women attempt to shore up their insecurities in a number of ways, including testing a man's interest, demand commitment, seeking reassurance, provoking arguments, etc., etc. and all of this behavior significantly increases the hassle associated with dealing with these women, especially since the man she doesn't like and who doesn't therefore arouse her insecurities, doesn't have to deal with any of this shit.

Between taking it slow and all of the annoying things that they're subject to doing when they're feeling insecure, women significantly decrease the good times to hassle ratio with the men they actually like. This is experienced as punitive by men who will not consequently make an effort to get you or keep you in their lives. Ladies, if you like a man, then reward him with fun times and good sex and then leave him alone. Leave him alone, leave him alone. I guarantee that men do not forget these women. You will hear from these men again. Maybe not quite as soon as you'd like, but you will trust me. It's like I still remember that corner in the city where I found 1000 bob 10 years ago. I will probably never forget that place for as long as I live, and I definitely walked by that place more than once to see if I might find something else there. In any case, ladies, if you want to nab a big fish, you have to ensure that the hook is firmly in place before you start reeling it in. And this is how you set the hook. Fun times. Good sex. Leave them alone.

So this is what I mean when I say that women do the right things with the wrong men. They have good times that don't really count with the men they don't really want relationships with, and they hold out and act nutty with the men they do want to have relationships with. I'm telling you, if that guy has any optionality whatsoever, and he probably does, if he's a high value man, he's not going to wait around just to pay more for less.

Now, the rebuttal I usually hear from women when I talk like this is something like, that's not true. It's not true. If a man really liked me, he'd be willing to wait. So if he's not willing to wait, that must mean that he doesn't really like me. He probably just wanted to use me for sex. So this strategy helps me weed out the fuckboys. After all, I don't want to just be used for sex. All right, let me respond to this. Leaving aside the fact that women often intentionally allow themselves to be used for sex, remember the woman in my anecdote allowed herself to be used for sex in order to have a place to stay for the night? The problem with this rebuttal is that it's too inclusive, like as a discrimination strategy, it will produce far too many positive outcomes Like, yes, if you make a fuckboy, wait, he won't stick around, correct? This is because waiting makes the same sexual opportunity increasingly more expensive. All other things being equal, and a fuckboy is trying to transact a sexual opportunity as cheaply as possible. However, not every man who won't wait around is a fuckboy. Okay, let me explain. Let's imagine that you have an all time favorite restaurant. The food is phenomenal, the ambiance is exquisite, the service is exceptional. Like everything. Everything about this place is wonderful. You love everything, but let's also imagine that you live two hours away. And that word has gotten out about how great this place is. So it's extremely difficult to get a reservation. And in order to even make a reservation, you first need to join some kind of Diners Club that requires a steep initiation fee and an interview process. How likely would it be that how often you eat there is an accurate reflection of how you feel about the place. You love this restaurant. The problem is that there are all of these obstacles in the way of you going there more frequently. If you were to confess this to the manager and he were to say well, if this really was your all time favorite restaurant, you wouldn't have an issue driving two hours to eat dinner and you would make it a priority to secure a reservation, because that's what people do when they love things. They go above and beyond. They make an effort, they're willing to wait. And the fact that you aren't willing to do those things means you probably couldn't care less about this establishment. Like, if he were to say this to you, I don't think you'd feel very heard and understood. The problem was not your level of interest in the restaurant. The problem was the number of fucking obstacles in the way of eating there. Women, if you like a guy do not put obstacles in the path of eating at your restaurant. Make the guys that you don't really like wait and allow the men you want to keep around to cut to the front of the line. Do this and you will have much more success with men. Okay, what do you think? Does this fit with your own experience? Let me know in the comments below.

© O'Rryan Tarraban

Digital Natives Ditching Relationships: Rise of AI Companions

"Where men are forbidden to honour a king they honour millionaires, athletes, or film-stars instead: even famous prostitutes or gangsters. For spiritual nature, like bodily nature, will be served; deny it food and it will gobble poison."

The first generation that grew up as digital natives is now entering their marriage and relationship years and all they have to show for it is hook up culture. Teaching young guys about female nature is like teaching a people in the south pacific how to ski; it’s completely irrelevant. Learning about female nature is more of confirmation bias this days. Now its more probably about making guys feel secure in their subconscious choice to avoid women and relationships. 

As men burn in passion in the wilderness of north America, this website called interesting engineering says: "we have entered an age of readily available AI girlfriend and AI sex bots." SexTech is expected to be a $3.3 billion industry by 2033, with a growing rise in preference and acceptance of robotic sex," predicts futurologist.

The Synthesis of Wisdom and Action: Uniting the Scholar and the Warrior

In the pursuit of human excellence, a timeless philosophy emerges: the integration of scholarly pursuits and the spirit of a warrior. This amalgamation, echoed through the ages, resonates with empirical research revealing the profound advantages of a harmonious blend of intellect and action.

Aristotle, a revered philosopher, extolled the virtues of balance between intellectual growth and physical vigor. His proposition resonates deeply with contemporary studies that emphasize the cognitive benefits of physical activity. Research conducted by Hillman, Erickson, and Kramer (2008) elucidates how exercise enhances cognitive functions, specifically in executive control and memory retention, aligning with the concept of a scholar athlete.

Moreover, the convergence of wisdom and action finds resonance in biblical wisdom. In the book of Proverbs, Solomon urges the pursuit of knowledge alongside moral courage, proclaiming, "The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and instruction" (Proverbs 1:7, ESV). This biblical exhortation resonates with the call to be both wise scholars and courageous warriors.

Yet, the synthesis is incomplete without acknowledging the significance of ethical action. The Apostle Paul implores in his letter to the Ephesians, "Be strong in the Lord and in the strength of his might" (Ephesians 6:10, ESV). This encapsulates the essence of strength derived not only from physical prowess but also from spiritual fortitude.

The warrior and the scholar, when harmonized, embody a holistic ideal. This fusion aligns with modern psychology, as expounded by Maslow's hierarchy of needs, where self-actualization arises from the fulfillment of physical, intellectual, and spiritual dimensions.

In conclusion, the union of the scholar and the warrior resonates deeply with empirical research, ancient wisdom, and biblical teachings. Embracing both intellectual pursuits and courageous action leads to a life of purpose, guided by wisdom and empowered by strength. As Proverbs 16:3 advises, "Commit your work to the LORD, and your plans will be established" (ESV), encompassing the essence of diligence, wisdom, and spiritual guidance in the pursuit of excellence. 

No Contact, No Conflict: A Code for Black Communities

n Sufism, the collective consciousness makes up the one true God. This one true God is the macrocosm, and those who gather to make it are the microcosms, or atoms. This interconnected system has codes of conduct.

In the ancient era, these codes were called the 42 ideals of Ma'at, and initiates renounced vices from their psyche. In the modern era, black people have become savage because they don't have such codes to maintain law and order in their communities.

Neely Fuller Jr., empathizing with the plight of black people in North America, constructed a single code that would harmonize the original people: no contact, no conflict.

Awareness is necessary so that we can witness the vile behavior that comes out of black people when they make contact. A good example is when DJ Moh flashed his gun during his friend's birthday bash.

After night or day shifts, when black people now lack something useful to do, they show off. The prime ingredient of this poison is boasting.

In the science of the soul, we are taught that this world is a prison house of chaurasi, and the prison master is white supremacy. Black folk boast to other non-white folks what the system of white supremacy has allowed them to have.

Examples of the over-the-counter guns they boast about are Colt, Smith and Wesson, and AK47. None of these weapons bear names of African descent. It had to be someone motivated by survival instinct and using diabolic wisdom who had to work in the lab to make them.

So now we have a Kenyan DJ who, in his friend's birthday party, which is a really secure environment, is showing off his 9mm to other Kenyans via the media and brewing conflict in the event of it.

The code again is no contact, no conflict. Contact should only be made when there is constructive information to convey or demand.

Rethinking Therapy Settings: Insights from "Redpill Psychology"

What can possibly be happening in the minds of men sitting in female dominated space, box of tissue at their side, with a woman saying “tell me how you feel” about this or that? Even worse, asking such probing questions with the implication that he is an empty emotional vessel in need of her redemption.

Lea Winerman, a staff writer for the American Psychological Association asks us to “imagine the Marlboro man in therapy.”

Imagine instead a therapy office in the boiler room of a ship, in a workshop, a park, a building site, mechanics shed or a sports locker room, with seating arrangements that allowed men to sit at 45 degree angles or side by side — engaged in some kind of task if they wished.  

       

Imagine too if we were to engage in some kind of typical male play or industry – not just Jungian sandplay or water-color art therapies as suits the more effeminate sensibilities of women, but hands on therapy – while driving a truck, fixing the engine of a car or building a piece of furniture.  

       

Or, if you prefer, something recreational. Standing on a pier fishing, hiking up the side of a hill or sitting beside a campfire.  

       

When it comes to communication, men like a medium, something through which to channel their energy.

To summarize, a new therapy for men might consider utilizing new settings for conducting consultations, including the use of a wider range of manual activities – occupations and crafts – as therapeutic mediums.

The Growing Political Divide Between Young Men and Women: An Evolutionary Perspective

In recent years, there has been a growing political divide between young men and women in many countries around the world. This divide is evident in a number of areas, including attitudes towards gender roles, social issues, and even the way that young people view the future. 

One way to understand this divide is from an evolutionary perspective. Evolutionary psychologists argue that men and women have different evolved psychological predispositions, which can lead to different political views. For example, men are more likely to be concerned with power and status, while women are more likely to be concerned with relationships and social harmony. This difference in priorities can lead to different views on issues such as economic inequality, immigration, and war.
Another way to understand the political divide between young men and women is through the lens of Carl Jung's concept of the shadow. The shadow is the unconscious part of the personality that contains all of the aspects of ourselves that we deem unacceptable. When we repress these aspects of ourselves, they can manifest in negative ways, such as through aggression, violence, or prejudice.

Jung believed that the shadow is a universal human phenomenon, but that it can be expressed differently in men and women. For men, the shadow is often associated with power, aggression, and violence. For women, the shadow is often associated with passivity, submission, and dependence. 

In the postmodern era, the shadow is increasingly being projected onto the opposite sex. This can lead to a situation where men and women see each other as enemies or competitors, rather than as potential partners. This can further exacerbate the political divide between young men and women. Of course, not all young men and women are divided by politics. There are many young people who are working to bridge the divide and create a more just a holy society. However, the growing political divide is a real challenge that we must address if we want to create a better future for all.

In conclusion, the political divide between young men and women is a complex issue with deep roots in our evolutionary history. However, it is important to remember that the shadow is not a fixed part of our personality. It can be transformed and integrated into our conscious awareness through the process of individuation. By working to understand and embrace our shadow, we can break down the barriers between men and women and create a more loving and harmonious world.

“Where love rules, there is no will to power, and where power predominates, love is lacking. The one is a shadow of the other.”

This quote by Carl Jung reminds us that love and power are two sides of the same coin. When we are ruled by love, we are motivated by compassion, cooperation, and mutual respect. When we are ruled by power, we are motivated by competition, dominance, and aggression. 

The political divide between young men and women is a reflection of the shadow side of our society. It is a manifestation of our fear, anger, and resentment. But it is also an opportunity for growth. By working to understand and embrace our shadow, we can create a more loving and harmonious world.

Rebuilding Sexual Health: Overcoming Porn Consumption and Rediscovering Intimacy

With unsupervised internet penetration, the number one habit men should incorporate to fight against weak erection is controlling porn consumption and joining a support system such as NoFap because studies have shown consumption of explicit content from the adult industry is the occulted cause of P.I.E.D among young males who are enduring in the closet. So when they replace that habit with exercising, it is fundamental for them to concentrate on one of the most hated compound exercises, i.e., squats because it amplifies the production of testosterone—the hormone that makes a male masculine and cultivates personal discipline. 

The female imperative fosters the practice of open hypergamy, and since in the hookup culture people meet via dating sites, 80% of females use the Pareto principle to mate with the optimal 20% of males, leaving the rest to become incels. So when the libido of involuntary celibate males builds up, with the click of a finger, they can satisfy themselves using their favorite fetish on the World Wide Web. After compulsive masturbation is reinforced for years, the nerves in the penis are fried by the extraordinary amount of dopamine released by the brain. So when the young man finally improves his SMV and manages to bed a girl, he comes to grips with the depressing realization that he is unable to get it up and has to reboot his mind. 

The minimum probation period for consuming sexual material and activity is 90 days. For others, it may take longer for the aforementioned nerves to repair plus the brain to rewire in order to associate arousal with the seductive qualities of the actual women who are attracted to him. 

Nevertheless, the ultimate goal is that during sexual arousal, the psychologically turned-on man's penis can successfully receive those signals from the central nervous system and command the heart to increase blood flow in the erectile tissues and the expanded chambers in the penis, resulting in a sustainable erection.

Recipe for Mastery: Combining Your Natural Ingredients with Passion

Just like a master chef combines natural ingredients with passion to create the perfect dish, the true masters of any field combine their natural talents with a burning passion for their craft. Research shows that individuals who are passionate about their work are more likely to achieve success. In addition, combining your natural abilities with a deep passion can unleash your full potential and propel you to great heights.  In the Bible, we see many examples of individuals who combined their natural talents with a passionate drive to achieve greatness. Moses, for example, was gifted with great leadership skills and a passion for his people, which led him to help deliver the Israelites from slavery and into the Promised Land.  At True North Wellness, our psychological counseling services can help you unlock your natural talents and cultivate a deep passion for your craft. Contact us today to schedule an appointment with one of our experienced counseling psychologists.